Rabbi david wolpe dating

Admittedly, however, there is a shortage of Egyptian documentation of the Exodus period. We need to understand how the ancient world viewed the whole idea of recording history.The vast majority of inscriptions found in the ancient world have a specific agenda -- to glorify the deeds of the king and to show his full military power.In the subjective field of Biblical Archaeology, anyone making a definitive statement like "archaeology has proven..." has probably chosen to take sides and is not presenting the whole picture.When Los Angeles Times reporter Teresa Watanabe writes that "the rabbi was merely telling his flock what scholars have known for more than a decade" (emphasis added), she is revealing her anti-Biblical bias.These show scenes from Sancheriv's military campaigns from the 8th century BCE, including graphic depictions of destroyed enemies (decapitations, impalings, etc.). But one element is missing from these inscriptions: There are no dead Assyrians!That is consistent with the ancient "historical" style -- negative events, failures and flaws are not depicted at all.

The article entitled, "Doubting the Story of Exodus," asserts that archaeology disproves the validity of the Biblical account.

The last thing the ancient Egyptians wanted to record is the embarrassment of being completely destroyed by the God of a puny slave nation.

Would the Egyptians ever want to preserve details of the destruction of fields, flocks, and first borns -- plus the death of Pharaoh and the entire Egyptian army at the Red Sea?

Abraham is dated to the 18th century BCE, while the Exodus story is generally dated to the 13th century BCE -- 800 years before Herodotus.

This does not mean that early civilizations did not record events.

Leave a Reply